For engineering teams writing regulated software with AI
Compliance-aware coding agents.
AI code reviewers catch compliance problems after the code is written. Anthara gives the coding agent your HIPAA and PCI-DSS controls before it writes, so fewer problems get written.
Book a demoPath 1Without Anthara
✕ Caught lateReviewed after it’s written
Pull request #482
Add retry logging to claims sync
def retry_claim(claim, patient):+ log.info(f"retry {claim.id} for {patient.mrn}") return sync.submit(claim)Found after the code was written. A senior reads it.
Path 2With
✓ PreventedPlanned with the HIPAA control
Agent plan
Add retry logging to claims sync
- Wrap the claim submit in a retry with backoff
- Log the claim ID only. Patient fields stay out of logs
- Add a test that log output carries no patient data
def retry_claim(claim, patient):+ log.info("retry", claim_id=claim.id) return sync.submit(claim)Designed out while planning. Nothing to review for it.
01 - The problem
Pull request reviews have stopped doing their job.
AI tools now write code faster than seniors can read it. Tests pass, but they don’t check whether a change logs a patient ID or sends card data outside PCI scope.
So seniors either read every AI-written change or let some through unread.
02 - How it works
Anthara stops compliance problems before they’re written.
While the agent plans a change, it reads the controls that apply to the files it will touch, so many problems are designed out rather than caught later.
After it writes, Anthara checks the change against the same rules, and the agent fixes what it finds before the pull request opens.
You set your standards once, and Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex all work to them.
Your rulesHIPAA · PCI-DSS · your engineering standards - set once
Claude Code · Cursor · Codex
Plan with the rules
Reads the controls for the files it will touch
Rules in viewIssues designed outWrite
Writes the change
Check
Checked against the same rules
Rules in viewFix
The agent fixes what the check finds
Issues fixed before the PRPull request
Opens after the fix
03 - Compared
How Anthara compares with an AI code reviewer.
| What’s compared | AI code reviewer | |
|---|---|---|
| 01When your rules are applied | After the code is written | While the agent plans the change |
| 02How problems get fixed | Suggested on the pull request | By the agent, before the pull request opens |
| 03HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and SaMD controls | Written by your team as rules | Ready-made packs |
| 04Your own standards in plain English | Yes | Yes |
| 05Runs on your own infrastructure | Enterprise plan | Yes |
| 06Covers code from Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex | Yes | Yes |
AI code reviewer · line 2
This logs a patient identifier (MRN). Patient data can’t go to application logs. Redact before merging.